GOOL RUSI VATCHA THORU. POA VIRAF RUSI VATCHA vs NAZIYA WASIM SHAIKH AND ORS

Neeta Sawant WP 3565 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3565 OF 2026 Gool Rusi Vatcha through Viraf Rusi Vatcha ….PETITIONER VERSUS. Naziya Wasim Shaikh & Ors. ….RESPONDENTS ___________ Mr. Nirman Sharma with Mr. Deeshank Doshi and Ms. Uma Sharma i/b. Dharam & Co., for the Petitioner Mr. M.A. Vaid with Ms. Vidhya N. Shet i/b. Vaid & Associates for Respondent No.1. CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J JUDG. RESD. ON: 07 APRIL 2026. JUDG. PRON. ON: 22 APRIL 2026. JUDGMENT: 1) The extent of inquiry to be conducted by the Executing Court under Order 21 Rule 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Code) when objection of the obstructor is found to be ex facie baseless is the issue involved in the Petition. Whether it is necessary to conduct a full-fledged inquiry like a trial in the suit in every obstruction application filed under Order 21 Rule 97 or Rule 99 on account of use of the words ‘all questions’ coupled with impermissibility to file a fresh suit under Rule 101 of Order ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO. 1 of 24 22 APRIL 2026 Neeta Sawant WP 3565