Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-06

FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 164 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 164 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 164 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 164 of 2026 Smt. Rashmi Rajpoot .....Appellant(s) Versus Sri Anil Rajpoot .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ram Kishor Gupta, Shiv Shankar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Santosh Kumar Tiwari Court No. - 2 HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant who is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 13.07.2023 passed in Case No.859 of 2022 passed by the court of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Jhansi whereby the respondent-husband Anil Rajpoot was granted divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. 2. The case put forth by learned counsel for the appellant is that the appellant was proceeded ex parte and did not have knowledge about the proceedings and that the order is bad in law as issues were never framed and lastly that the appellant was never informed of her right to appeal by the learned trial court. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent on the other hand has submitted that the appeal has been filed with a delay of more than 900 days and that in the meanwhile, the respondent has got married again and has a 5 months old child from

FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 164 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam