DAYAL & ORS. vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 + CRL.M.C. 1855/2026 DAYAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with IO/SI Jagmohan. Victim through videoconferencing. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 385/2022 of PS Ranhola for offence under Section 323/440/506/34 IPC on the ground that the victim (respondent no.2 herein) has compromised the disputes. 2. The petition was initially listed before this court on 13.03.2026 and parties were directed to appear before the concerned Joint Registrar, where their statements were recorded. 3. Today, after recording of statements matter has been listed before this CRL.M.C.1855/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.29 05:05:38 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:29.04.2026 17:19:49 court. The respondent no.2 present through videoconferencing is identified by Investigating Officer/SI Jagmohan. 4. Learned APP for State submits that he has no serious objection to this petition. 5. The respondent no.2 submits that in the alleged incident, he did not receive any physical injury but his car was damaged, for which he has been duly compensated by the petitioners. Respondent no.2 submits that he does not wish to continue prosecution of the petitioners. 6. Having spo