Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-28

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 854 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 854 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 854 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 854 of 2026 X Juvenile .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Neetu Pal, Rampyare Lal Srivastava, Sarfaraz Ahmad, Subash Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. As per office report dated 12.3.2026, notice has been served on opposite party nos. 2 to 4, but no one has turned up to opposed this revision. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 6.12.2025, passed by Additional Session Judge/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Court Room No.1, Gorakhpur, in Juvenile Criminal Appeal No. 186 of 2025 ('X' Juvenile vs. State of UP and another) and the order dated 30.10.2025, passed by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Gorakhpur, in Bail Application No.211 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 541 of 2025, under Sections 64(1), 352, 351(3) of BNS and 5/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Pipraich, District Gorakhpur. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juven

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 854 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam