Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-28

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2570 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2570 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2570 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2570 of 2026 Xyz Minor .....Revisionist(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anil Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Aqueel Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Vijay Tripathi, G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Vijay Tripathi, learned counsel for opposite party no.2. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 23.1.2026, passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge TRC, POCSO Act, Etawah in Criminal Appeal No. 100 of 2025 (XYZ son of Sanju vs. State of UP and another) and the order dated 22.12.2025, passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Etawah, in Case Crime No.38 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 238A, 3(5) of BNS, Police Station Balrai, District Etawah. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 17 years, 5 months and 24 days on the date of alleged incident; He is in jail since 3.8.2025; (ii) the applicant has been falsely implicated; (iii) there is no specific or strong objection raised in the DPO repor

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2570 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam