Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-15

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2190 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2190 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2190 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2190 of 2026 Juvenile X .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Manish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Arpit Pal, G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no.2. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 03.02.2026 passed by Juveenile Justice Court, Auraiya in Criminal Appeal No. 98 of 2025 (Juvenile X vs. State of U.P. and others) and the order dated 16.12.2025 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Auraiya in Case Crime No. 567 of 2025 under Section 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and Section 3/4(2) POCSO Act, Police Station Dibiyapur District Auraiya. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile below 18 years of age on the date of alleged incident; He is in observation home since 27.10.2025; (ii) the applicant has been falsely implicated; (iii) there is no specific or strong objection raised in the DPO report, other than the general and vague observations; (i

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2190 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam