Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-20

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1532 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1532 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1532 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1532 of 2026 Juvenile S .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ajitam Srivastav, Ravi Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. As per office report dated 03.04.2026, notice has been served on opposite party no.2, but no one has turned up to opposed this revision. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 04.02.2026 passed by Special Judge POCSO Act/ Additional Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad in Criminal Appeal No. 07 of 2026 (Juvenile 'S' vs. State of U.P.) and the order dated 5.1.2026 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Farrukhabad in Bail Application No. 3132 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 311 of 2025 under Section 64(1), 352, 351(3) BNS and Sessions 3/4, 5L/6 POCSO Act and 67 I.T. Act, Police Station Kaimganj, District Farrukhabad. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 16 years, 06 months and 09 days on the date of alleged inc

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1532 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam