Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-03

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1484 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1484 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1484 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1484 of 2026 Juvenile X .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ripu Soodan Yadav, Sohan Lal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 12.12.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Court, POCSO-I, District Prayagraj in Juvenile Appeal No. 170 of 2025; titled Juvenile vs. State of U.P. and another, as well as order dated 04.11.2025 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Khulabad, District Prayagraj in Case Crime No. 110 of 2025, under Sections 352, 351(2), 55 BNS and Section 66 Information Technology Act, Police Station Sarai Mamrej, District Prayagraj. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 17 years and 5 months on the date of alleged incident; He is in jail since 27.7.2025; (ii) the applicant has been falsely implicated; (iii) there is no specific or strong objection raised in the DPO report,

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1484 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam