Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-03

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1429 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1429 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1429 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1429 of 2026 Juvenile X .....Revisionist(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey, Saurabh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 18.12.2025 passed by Juvenile Court/Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO) Act, Sonbhadra, in Criminal Appeal No.82 of 2025 and the order dated 11.11.2025 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Sonbhadra in Case Crime No.17 of 2025 under Section 103(1), 61(2)a BNS, Police Station Karma, District Sonbhadra (U.P.) Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 17 years on the date of alleged incident; He is in observation home since 29.03.2025; (ii) the applicant has been falsely implicated; (iii) there is no specific or strong objection raised in the DPO report, other than the general and vague observations; (iv) there is no criminal history of the applicant; (v) there is no hop

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1429 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam