Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-27

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1398 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1398 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1398 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1398 of 2026 X Juvenile .....Revisionist(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Arun Kumar Srivastav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Surendra Pal, G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State. None is present on behalf of opposite party no.2 even in the revised call. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 13.01.2026 passed by learned Judge Child Court/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Additional District & Sessions Judge, Pilibhit in Criminal Appeal No.92/2025 and the order dated 02.12.2025 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Pilibhit in Case No.91/2025 arising out of Case Crime No.313/2025 under Sections- 191(2), 191(3), 118(1), 74, 76, 103(1), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) BNS and Section- 3(1)(Da), 3(1) (Dha), 3(2) (v) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Bilaspur, District-Pilibhit. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 17 years on the date of alleged incident; He is in observation since 07.08.2025; the applicant has

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1398 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam