Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-09
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1329 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Citation / case number
- CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1329 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Court
- Allahabad High Court
- Petitioner
- CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1329 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Respondent
- Unknown
Judgment text excerpt
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1329 of 2026 Juvenile A .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Manju Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. As per office report dated 28.3.2026, notice has been served on opposite party no.2, but no one has turned up to opposed this revision. Heard Ms. Priti Chaudhary, learned Advocate holding brief of Ms. Manju Yadav, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 28.1.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Etah in Criminal Appeal No. 119 of 2025 (Juvenile A vs. State of U.P. & another) and the order dated 3.12.2025 in Bail Application No. 92 of 2025 under Sections 70(2), 351(2) BNS & Section 5g/6 POCSO Act passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Etah arising out of Case Crime No. 247 of 2025 under Section 70(1), 351(2) BNS and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Nidhauli Kala District Etah. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 15 years, 6 months