Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-09

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1323 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1323 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1323 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1323 of 2026 Juvenile X .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Manju Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. As per office report dated 28.3.2026, notice has been served on opposite party no.2, but no one has turned up to opposed this revision. Heard Ms. Priti Chaudhary, learned Advocate holding brief of Ms. Manju Yadav, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 28.1.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Etah in Criminal Appeal No. 120 of 2025 (Juvenile X vs. State of U.P. & another) and the order dated 3.12.2025 in Bail Application No. 93 of 2025 under Sections 70(2), 351(2) BNS & Section 5g/6 POCSO Act passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Etah arising out of Case Crime No. 247 of 2025 under Section 70(1), 351(2) BNS and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Nidhauli Kala District Etah. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 15 years, 6 months

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1323 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam