Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-09

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1285 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1285 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1285 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1285 of 2026 Pankaj Yadav .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Sanjoo Yadav, Shivajee Srivastava, Shrikant Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Alok Kumar, G.A., Tej Bahadur Singh Yadav Court No. - 87 HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard Sri Shivajee Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Dilip Kumar Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Alok Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 and 3. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist has preferred the instant criminal revision with the relief which has been mentioned in the prayer clause. The relief which has been mentioned in the revision is delineated below:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present criminal revision and set-aside the impugned order dated 19.11.2025 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Mau in Case No.278 of 2025 (Pratibha Yadav Vs. Pankaj Yadav) Under Section 144 B.N.S.S., District-Mau. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be please

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1285 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam