Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-24

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1089 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1089 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1089 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Reserved on 19.02.2026 Delivered on 24.04.2026 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1089 of 2026 Smt Arti and another …..Revisionist(s) Versus State of U.P. and another …..Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anil Kumar, Gagan Pratap Singh, Mukesh Joshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Swapnil Sinha WITH CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2565 of 2025 Rinku Faujdar @ Manvendra …..Revisionist(s) Versus State of U.P. and another …..Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anil Kumar, Gagan Pratap Singh, Mukesh Joshi, Shivam Kumar Dubey, Umesh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Swapnil Sinha Court No. - 19 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Revisionists, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 and learned A.GA. for the State. 2. Present Criminal Revisions have been preferred against the order dated 15.02.2025 passed by learned District Judge, Agra in Sessions Trial No. 2859 of 2023(State Vs. Vijay Prakash@Karua & others), 2 CRLR No. - 1089 of 2026 arising out of Case Crime No. 120 of 2023 under Section 147, 148, 302/149, 120-B IPC, P.S.-Kagaraul, District Agra. 3. Since both the aforementioned cr

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1089 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam