Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-24

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1027 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1027 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1027 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1027 of 2026 Mr X Juvenile .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ripu Soodan Yadav, Sohan Lal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Compliance affidavit filed on behalf of State by learned AGA is taken on record. As per office report dated 10.4.2026, notice has been served on opposite party no.2, but no one has turned up to opposed this revision. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 12.12.2025 passed by A.S.J./ Special Court, POCSO-I, Prayagraj in Juvenile Appeal No. 170 of 2025 and the order dated 18.10.2025 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Khuldabad, Prayagraj in Case Crime No. 107 of 2025 under Sections 3(5), 103(2) B.N.S., Police Station Sarai Mamrej, District Prayagraj. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the revisionist was not named in the FIR and he was a juvenile aged about 17 years and 5 months on the date of alleged incident; He is in reformatory house sinc

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1027 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam