Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-06

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 2826 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 2826 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 2826 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2826 of 2026 Saniya Rinku Shaikh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite parties. 2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos.2 & 3 to lodge the first information report on the application of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner had attempted to lodge the first information report, but no heed was paid and the F.I.R. was not lodged. The petitioner also moved several complaints and applications before the competent authorities, but till date FIR has not been lodged. 4. The Supreme Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others, (2014) 2 SCC 1, has observed that a Police Officer cannot avoid his duty for registering an offence if in the application cognizable offenc

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 2826 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam