Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-17

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9418 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9418 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9418 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9418 of 2026 Naveen .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 (Sl. No.43 out of 269) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Atul Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 35 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) BNS and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Uttar, District Firozabad, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The victim is a consenting party as is but evident from her statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., whereby she has married the applicant. The victim, by her physical appearance, seems to be major although her age is 17 years as per ossification test report and a leverage of two years may be granted

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9418 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam