Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-23

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 6040 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 6040 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 6040 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6040 of 2026 Mahendra Singh .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 73 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Learned A.G.A. submits that instructions have been received and has no objection in case the bail application is heard on merits. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is Lekhpal and it is alleged that the applicant has demanded Rs.10,000/- from the complainant. Thereafter, the complaint made a complaint and trap team was constituted. The The applicant has been arrested and Rs.10,000/- was recovered from possession of the applicant. The amount was being demanded by the applicant for bringing on record the name of legal heirs in the revenue record. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Firstly, zero first information report was lodged and thereafter, on the next date present regular first information report was lodged. The alleged incident

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 6040 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam