Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-06

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4410 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4410 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4410 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4410 of 2026 Satendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ehtesham Akhtar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Amit Singh, Anurag Pandey, G.A. Court No. - 65 (Sl. No. 82 out of 317) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Ehtesham Akhtar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Anurag Pandey, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Jai Kishan Chaurasia, learned State Law Officer and also perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 293 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 127(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS and Sections 3/4(2) of POCSO Act, Police Station - Rura, District - Kanpur Dehat, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence as alleged in the FIR. The FIR is delayed by more than four days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. 5. Learned counsel has further submitted that the victim w

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4410 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam