Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-02

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 11099 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 11099 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 11099 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11099 of 2026 Aman .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akanksha Singh, Swayamanand Sisodiya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Anupam Anand, learned Brief Holder for the State-opposite party and perused the record. 2. The present bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 147 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352, 125, 109(1), 3(5), 61(2), 111(4), 324(4) BNS, Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act and Section 25(9) Arms Act, Police Station Bahsuma, District Meerut, during the pendency of trial. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, two groups were firing at each other. In the alleged incident, no person received any injury. A vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant. It is next contended that the applicant is neither a member of any organized crime syndic

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 11099 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam