Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-07

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3460 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3460 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3460 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3460 of 2026 Naveen Rathi .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra, G.A. Court No. - 51 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel opposite party no.2. 2. The present appeal has been filed with a prayer to quash the summoning order dated 17th February, 2026 passed by the Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Saharanpur in Complaint Case No. 116 of 2024 (Vipin Kumar Vs. Suleman & Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 31 of 2023 under Sections 504 and 506 I.P.C. and Sections 3 (1) (da), 3 (1) (dha) and 3 (2) (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, 1989, Police Station- Sadar Bazar, District-Sahanpur. 3. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the appellants are innocent, as the present first information report implicating the appellants is false and fabricated with ulterior motive. The present first information report lodged by o

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3460 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam