Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-29

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3327 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3327 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3327 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3327 of 2026 Sajan @ Suraj @ Shivmilan .....Appellant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Pradeep Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Raj Nath Bhakta, Vinod Kumar Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri S.K. Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pradeep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Birendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 3. Sri Raj Nath Bhakta and Sri Vinod Kumar, learned counsels for the opposite party no.2/first informant are not present even when the matter has been taken up in the revised call. 4. Notice on the opposite party no.3/High Court Legal Service Committee has been served on 25.03.2026 in their office but there is no representation on behalf of the said committee even in the revised list. 5. Previously when the matter was taken up on 16.04.2026 even in the revised call learned counsels for the opposite party no.2 were not present and thus the matter was adjourned for today making it clear that the matter will not be adjourned on the next date even in their absence

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3327 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam