Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-13

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3139 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3139 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3139 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3139 of 2026 Mukesh .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Anurag Shrivastava, Shiv Bhushan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 50 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed by the appellant to set aside the bail rejection order dated 16.01.2026 passed by Special Judge SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Kasganj in Bail Application No.23 of 2026 arising out of Case Crime No.470 of 2025, under Sections 64(2)M, 333, 351(3) BNS and 3(2)5 of SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Police Station Sahavar, District Kasganj. 2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, the learned AGA for the State- respondent no.1, Mr. Mohit Kumar, learned counsel for the informant and perused the entire record. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the appellant is that the appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The appellant has not committed any offence as alleged in the impugned FIR. Prosecution story is totally false and fabricated. FIR is highly delayed about

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3139 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam