Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-22

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1424 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1424 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1424 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1424 of 2026 Smt Neeraj Devi .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Anupam Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rahul Saxena Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Sunil Vasisth, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anupam Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Rahul Saxena, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Birendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 3. Office to trace out the vakalatnama of Sri Rahul Saxena and place it on record and make a note in the order sheet about. 4. Counter affidavit of the State served today in Court on learned counsel for the appellant has been filed in Court, the same is taken on record. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that although he was granted time twice to file counter affidavit but he does not proposes to file any counter affidavit. 6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not proposes to file any rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit of the State. The matter is ripe for hearing and the Court pro

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1424 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam