Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Gujarat High Court · 2026-04-24

CR.RA/435/2023

Citation / case number
2026:GUJHC:28005
Court
Gujarat High Court
Petitioner
CR.RA/435/2023
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/435/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 24/04/2026 2026:GUJHC:28005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (FOR MAINTENANCE) NO. 435 of 2023 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR ========================================================== Approved for Reporting Yes No ========================================================== AJMERI EZAZBHAI AHEMADBHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MR N P PANDYA(11241) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 RAZIN S ZEENA(9377) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 24/04/2026 JUDGMENT Today, when the matter is called out, learned counsel for the applicant remained absent. Even on the earlier dates, none had remained present on behalf of the applicant. Therefore, it clearly transpires that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the present matter. Hence, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Taj Mohammad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh,

CR.RA/435/2023 · Niyam