Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-20

CONCERTINA COILS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR & ANR. vs NAVDEEP SHARMA & ANR.

Citation / case number
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)-137/2026 2026:DHC:3281
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
CONCERTINA COILS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR & ANR.
Respondent
NAVDEEP SHARMA & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20.04.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 137/2026 CONCERTINA COILS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Petal Chandhok & Mr. Veer Vikram Singh, Advs. versus NAVDEEP SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samdish Sahdev & Mr. Marinal Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking the following reliefs: “A. Pass an ad interim ex parte injunction and/or upon notice an interim injunction, restraining Respondent No. 1 (Navdeep Sharma) and Respondent No. 2 (Pankaj Kumar), their servants, agents, employees, representatives, nominees, and associates, directly or indirectly, in any capacity whatsoever, approaching, soliciting, contracting with, or otherwise dealing, directly or 1 Act 2. The present disputes are stated to have arisen out of the Letter of Engagement dated 22.04.2025 as entered into between the Petitioner and Respondent No.1, as well as the Secondment and Letter of Engagement, which was entered into between the Petitione