CONCERTINA COILS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR & ANR. vs NAVDEEP SHARMA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20.04.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 137/2026 CONCERTINA COILS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Petal Chandhok & Mr. Veer Vikram Singh, Advs. versus NAVDEEP SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samdish Sahdev & Mr. Marinal Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking the following reliefs: “A. Pass an ad interim ex parte injunction and/or upon notice an interim injunction, restraining Respondent No. 1 (Navdeep Sharma) and Respondent No. 2 (Pankaj Kumar), their servants, agents, employees, representatives, nominees, and associates, directly or indirectly, in any capacity whatsoever, approaching, soliciting, contracting with, or otherwise dealing, directly or 1 Act Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 137/2026 Page 1 of 6 By:NEERU Signing Date:21.04.2026 17:24:47 indirectly, in any manner whatsoever, with any of the following existing or prospective clients of the Petitioners, including but not limited to in relation to the Jindal Mmamabula Energy Project and allied works, pending the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal and until the conclusion of arbitral proceedings: (i) Power Plant Engineers Ltd.; (ii) Jindal Energy Botswana Pty. Ltd.; (iii) Matal Ventures Pty. Ltd.; (iv) Jay Cee Bee Plant Hire Pty. Ltd. (t/a Shumba Plant Hire); (v) EH Constructions; (vi) Rakaru Investment Pty. Ltd.; (vii) Shymal; (viii) Transrail; (ix) Tecknow; and (x) Any other existing or prospective client of the Petitioner and/or MIPL whose identity, contact details, or business information was obtai