Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-28

COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. 7 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. 7 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. 7 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. - 7 of 2026 Aniruddh Jain and 2 others .....Appellant(s) Versus Ess Aar Universal Pvt. Ltd. and 4 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ashish Kumar Singh (Sr. Advocate), Puneet Arun Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vedant Agarwal Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 25.02.2026 passed by the Commercial Court - I, Agra whereby the application filed by the appellants under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC has been rejected. 2. A civil suit for recovery of money being CS (OS) No. 1703 of 2002 was filed before the Delhi High Court against respondents no. 2, 3, 4, 5 and father of appellants no. 1 and 2, which suit was decreed ex-parte with cost. 3. Execution was laid in the District Court, Karkarduma, Delhi and was transferred to the court of District Judge, Agra. On 13.02.2017 the Delhi Court issued Precepts to District Judge, Agra for attachment of various properties, including the property forming subject matter of application under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC. On 18.04.2017 District Judge, Agra issued a warrant of attachment, which

COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. 7 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam