Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-08

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. 54 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. 54 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. 54 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 54 of 2026 Ram Dayal .....Applicant(s) Versus Smt. Rajarani And Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv S.E. Chitambar, Deepak Verma, Shikhar Raj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Court No. - 20 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the record. 2. The instant review application is preferred to review the order dated 06.02.2026 passed by this Court in Second Appeal Defective No.7 of 2026 (Ram Dayal v. Smt. Rajarani and Others), wherein this court has dismissed the appeal on the ground of delay and laches. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the reasons for delay in filing the second appeal was properly explained by the applicant in the affidavit filed in support of delay condonation application along with memo of the Second Appeal which has not been properly appreciated by this court while dismissing the appeal on the ground of delay and laches. 9. He submitted that the applicant was not aware of the impugned order which was challenged in the second appeal. He further submitted that when the applicant get to know the

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. 54 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam