CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 112 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 112 of 2026 Vinod Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Muktesh Kumar Singh, Ravi Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. This is a review application filed alongwith delay condonation application by a new counsel, who has not argued the original writ petition. 2. In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. N. Raju Reddiar reported in (1997) 9 SCC 736, the present review application alongwith delay condonation application filed by a new counsel, who has not argued the original petition, is not maintainable. The relevant paragraph of the aforesaid judgment reads as under:- "1. It is a sad spectacle that new practice unbecoming of worthy and conducive to the profession is cropping up. Mr. Mariaputham, Advocate- on-Record had filed vakalatnama for the petitioner respondent when the special leave petition was filed. After the matter was disposed of, Mr. V. Balachandran, Advocate had filed a petition for review. That was a