Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-27

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 110 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 110 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 110 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 110 of 2026 Pooran Lal Meena and 6 others .....Applicant(s) Versus Union of India and 4 others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shiv Kumar Pal (D.S.G.I.) Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This review application has been filed for review of order dated 12.02.2026, passed in Writ - A No. 2096 of 2026, whereby the writ petition filed by the applicants against order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal has been dismissed. 2. The application is barred by 26 days. 3. An application seeking condonation of delay has been filed. 4. For the reasons indicated in the application, supported by affidavit, the same is allowed. 5. Delay in filing the review application is condoned. 6. Counsel for the applicants submitted that the Tribunal had decided the Original Application ('OA') with the assumption that there were 44 vacancies whereas from the material available on record, there were 61 vacancies, which aspect was not taken into consideration by the Tribunal and the writ petition also

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 110 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam