BRIJ LAL & SONS vs DDA

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 6th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 15th April, 2026 + EX.S.A. 4/2019 BRIJ LAL & SONS .....Appellant Through: Tilak Raj Gogia, in-person, Partner of Appellant-Firm. versus DDA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Pulak Gupta and Mr. Fajallu Rehman, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA JUDGMENT AMIT SHARMA, J. 1. The present appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, read with Order XXI Rules 11, 58 with the Sections 96/100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 19081, and Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeks the following prayers: - “a. Allow the second appeal as "an appeal u/s 10 of the Delhi high court act read with order 21rule 11,58 with the section 96/100 of the cpc and also 227- ci for quashing and setting aside against the order dated 27.11.2018, (impugned order) vide RCA 27/15, m- 1 For short, ‘CPC’ Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BHASKAR SINGH RAWAT EX.S.A. 4/2019 Page 1 of 21 Signing Date:16.04.2026 15:25:56 1448/16 page – 43 dt 1/6/16 passed by Mr. Surya Malik Grover adj- 01, south east court, saket, new delhi. b. and pay the interest as per the award rate from 18.01.1989 to last payment somewhere made on 19.03.2013 on Rs. 53000/- which come to approximately 1.5 lakh. c. Allow the further interest as per the court directed. d. Allow the cost bear in the trial court approximately 1.5 lakh. e. Allow the any other or further order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed.” 2. The present appeal assails the impugned order dated 27.11.2018 passed by learned Additional District Judge-01, South-East, Saket Courts, New Delhi, whereby, the application under Order XLVII read with Section 114