BITTOO & ORS. vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 + CRL.M.C. 1277/2026 BITTOO & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with IO/SI Om Prakash. Ms. Babita and Mr. Deepanshu, Advocates for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 954/2022 of PS Prem Nagar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2 herein) has settled all matrimonial disputes with the petitioners. 2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. CRL.M.C.1277/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, Signature Not Verified ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed Date: 2026.04.29 05:04:28 -07'00' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:29.04.2026 17:19:49 3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/SI Om Prakash. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. No child was born from wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Re