Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-15

ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. 6 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. 6 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. 6 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. - 6 of 2026 M/S Prince Enterprises .....Applicant(s) Versus Chief Executive Officer, Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar, Gyan Prakash Singh, Neetu Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Aditya Bhushan Singhal Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rejoinder affidavit filed today, is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that an agreement was entered into between the parties and work was completed on 25.2.2016. He submits that after completing the work, the petitioner submitted bills for payment before the opposite party in the year 2016 but the same has not been paid till date. He submits that petitioner has earlier approached this Court by filing Writ C No. 36482/2022, which was disposed of as withdraw vide order 1.12.2022 with liberty to the petitioner to invoke the arbitration clause, thereafter, the applicant has sent notice for appointment of sole arbitration but no consented arbitration could be appointed. Hence the present application has been filed f

ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. 6 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam