Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-28

ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. 13 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. 13 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. 13 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. - 13 of 2026 M/S Eco Turnkey Solutions Pvt. Ltd. .....Applicant(s) Versus Roto Pumps Limited Office At And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rahul Kumar Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant application has been preferred under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a sole Arbitrator. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in terms of purchase order dated 27.7.2021 (as amended on 18.1.2022) executed between the parties, the applicant furnished the bank guarantee and with regard to supply of material an email was sent by the opposite party on 23.11.2021 and in pursuance thereof, the applicant has made supply. However, some dispute arose between the parties with regard to payment, therefore, the applicant had invoked the arbitration clause of the purchase order by sending notice to the opposite party but no consented arbitrator could be appointed. 4. The submissions of the counsel for the applicant was vehemently opposed b

ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. 13 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam