Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-08

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9546 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9546 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9546 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9546 of 2026 Vinod Singh .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anupam Kumar Shukla, Himanshu Kumar, Utkarsh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Utkarsh Pandey, learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State. 2. Present application has been preferred with prayer for quashing of charge sheet dated 26.12.2021, cognizance order dated 16.2.2022 along with entire proceeding of Case no. 6775 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime no. 32 of 2021 under sections 147, 506, 323, 504 IPC, PS- Kotwali, District Kanpur Nagar. 3. The precise legal argument has been raised by learned counsel for the applicant is that although FIR has been instituted at the behest of opposite party no. 2 by way of implicating one named person and along with four unnamed person which attracted sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 506 IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, but at the time of preferring charge sheet after conducting detailed investigation, concerned Investigating Officer preferred charge sheet against only

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9546 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam