Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-01

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9433 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9433 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9433 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9433 of 2026 Narendra Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vikrant Singh Parihar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA. 2. The present application has been filed by applicant praying for quashing of chargesheet dated 0901.2024 along with cognizance/summoning order dated 14.03.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.17170 of 2024 (State Vs Narendra Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime No.582 of 2023, under Section 504, 506, 427, 447 IPC, P.S. Sumerpur, District Hamirpur, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hamirpur. 3. The only argument raised by learned counsel for applicants is that implication of the applicants under Section 447 IPC in charge-sheet is unwarranted since for implication under Section 447 IPC, prior notice is mandatory as per U.P. Amendment Act, 1961. In Support of his submission, learned counsel for applicants placed reliance upon a judgement of this Court passed in the c

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9433 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam