Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-07

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9316 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9316 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9316 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9316 of 2026 Mithilesh Kumar .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Singh, Sunil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vinod Kr Pandey Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Vinod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 07.12.2025 and cognizance/summoning order dated 30.01.2026 along with entire criminal proceedings of Case No.1881 of 2026 (State Vs. Mithilesh Kumar), arising out of Case Crime no. 107 of 2025, under Section 420 IPC, P.S.- Durgaganj, District Bhadohi, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) F.T.C./Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi Gyanpur. 3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 only to harass him since no offence as alleged, has ever been committed by him. It has also

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9316 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam