Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-07

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9253 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9253 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9253 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9253 of 2026 Sanjay Nishad @ Madan .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shitala Sahay Srivastav, Sudhir Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application under section 528 BNSS has been preferred to quash the charge-sheet no.A124/2025 dated 27.07.2025, cognizance/summoning order dated 11.08.2025 and bailable warrant dated 13.01.2026 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No.507 of 2025 (State vs. Sanjay Nishad @ Madan) arising out of Case Crime No.175 of 2025, under sections 76, 351(2) BNS, P.S. Chandwak, District- Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), New Court No.10/Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. 3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 only to harass him since no offence as alleged, has ever been committed by him. It has also been argued by learned counsel for applicant that app

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9253 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam