Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-07
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9245 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Citation / case number
- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9245 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Court
- Allahabad High Court
- Petitioner
- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9245 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Respondent
- Unknown
Judgment text excerpt
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9245 of 2026 Mukesh Alias Mukesh Kumar .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Kapoor Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application under section 528 BNSS has been preferred to quash the charge-sheet dated 03.09.2020 and cognizance/summoning order dated 16.02.2022 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.12392 of 2022 (State vs. Tribhuwan & Others) arising out of Case Crime No.227 of 2020, under sections 323, 504, 506, 325, 308 IPC, P.S. Phoolpur, District- Varanasi, pending in the court of learned Fast Track Court (Junior Division), Varanasi. 3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 only to harass him since no offence as alleged, has ever been committed by him. It has also been argued by learned counsel for applicant that the applicant was not present at the time of incident, since he was reported corona positive