Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-13

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9209 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9209 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9209 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9209 of 2026 Naval Kishor Maurya And Another .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Debee Shanker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 24.07.2025 submitted under Section 115(2), 352, 351(3), 75 BNS against applicant no.1 and under Section 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS against applicant no.2 as well as cognizance order dated 13.01.2026 alongwith entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.138 of 2026 (State Vs. Naval Kishor Maurya and others), arising out of Case Crime No.1117 of 2024, under Section 115(2), 352, 351(3), 75 BNS, P.S. Baheri, District Bareilly, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Baheri, Bareilly. 3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet along with the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is require

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9209 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam