Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-13

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9142 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9142 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9142 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9142 of 2026 Sageer And Another .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jai Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA for the State- respondent. 2. The instant application has been preferred for challenging the entire proceedings of Session Trial No.235 of 2024 (State Vs. Shahadat and others), arising out of Case Crime No.20 of 2022, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC, P.S. Nakhasa, District- Sambhal, pending before learned Additional District and Session Judge, Sambhal at Chandausi, including chargesheet dated 30.03.2022, cognizance/summoning order dated 29.04.2022 and order dated 11.11.2025, through which discharge application preferred at the behest of applicants has been rejected. 3. Learned counsel for applicants argued that applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 only to harass them since no offence as alleged has ever been committed by them. It has also been argued by learned counsel for ap

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9142 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam