Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-01
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 8399 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Citation / case number
- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 8399 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Court
- Allahabad High Court
- Petitioner
- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 8399 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Respondent
- Unknown
Judgment text excerpt
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 8399 of 2026 Maihrajul Hasnain @ Merajul Hasnain And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Irshad Saleem Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Nitin Kumar, Rajendra Kumar Singh Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA for the State-respondent. 2. The present application has been preferred challenging chargesheet dated 13.11.2025, cognizance/summoning order dated 26.11.2025 and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2339 of 2025 (State Vs. Mehrajul Hasnain and others), arising out of Case Crime No.116 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 62(2), 338 BNS, P.S. Nagina, District- Bijnor, pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagina, Bijnor. 3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 only to harass them since no offence as alleged, has ever been committed by them. It has also been argued by learned counsel for applicants that applicant have been implicated in this case on account of c