Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-07

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 7869 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 7869 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 7869 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 7869 of 2026 Kuldeep .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sukrampal, Tikendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of entire proceeding of Case Crime no. 207 of 2022 under sections 420, 406, 506 IPC, PS- Surir, District Mathura and set aside the cognizance order dated 19.7.2023 passed by learned Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Court no. 8, Mathura and charge sheet dated 24.3.2023. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant has challenged the impugned charge sheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breath as per the proposition of law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another reported in 2024 10 SCC 690. The relevant portion of

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 7869 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam