Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-16

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6812 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6812 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6812 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 6812 of 2026 Sugreev And Another .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Bachan Yadav, Ram Sakal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Sakal Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. On previous occasion notices were issued to opposite party no.2 and the same has been reported as served, and notices has been sent to the mobile phone of opposite party No.2, since she is residing at Kolkata and as such process adopted by concerned authorities for service of notice shows that the notices are being served upon opposite party No.2. When the matter has been taken up today none appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2 either in person or through counsel. No option left but to consider the prayer as made through instant application on the basis of documents available in the records as well as arguments raised by learned counsel for the applicants, although it is moral and legal obligation upon the opposite party no.2 to put his appearance

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 6812 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam