Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-13

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 14930 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 14930 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 14930 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14930 of 2026 Tirmal Singh .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mukesh Joshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 03.05.2017 and cognizance/summoning order dated 07.07.2017 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.2484 of 2017 (State Vs. Tirmal Singh), arising out of Case Crime no.84 of 2016, under Sections 406, 417, 419, 420 IPC, P.S.- Koirauna, District Bhadohi, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Bhadohi, Gyanpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant has challenged the impugned chargesheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breath as per the proposition of law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 14930 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam