Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-27

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 14621 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 14621 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 14621 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14621 of 2026 Intzar .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State. 2. Present application has been preferred with prayer to quash charge sheet dated 30.6.2024 along with cognizance order dated 9.12.2024 as well as entire criminal proceeding of Case no. 19815 of 2024 (State vs. Intzar) arising out of Case Crime no. 32 of 2024 under Section 174-A IPC, PS- Mundali, District Meerut. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned proceeding is barred under Section 195 Cr.P.C. as this Section specifically provides that cognizance of any offence punishable u/s 172 to 188 I.P.C., cannot be taken by the court except on the complaint in writing of the court concerned or its officer. However, in the present case, F.I.R. has been lodged by the Investigating Officer and even charge sheet of the same cannot be termed as "complaint" as per Section 2(d) of Cr.P.

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 14621 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam