Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-09

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1391 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1391 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1391 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1391 of 2026 Dinesh Kumar Singh …..Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 others …..Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar, Bhanu Pratap Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Manoj Kumar Nishad, Skand Bajpai Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Arpan Trehan, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri G.D. Bhatt, the learned Additional Government Advocate-I representing the opposite parties no. 1 & 2 and Sri Skand Bajpai, the learned counsel who has filed his vakalatnama for the opposite party no. 3, which is taken on record. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S., 2023, the applicant has challenged the validity of an order dated 10.09.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar in Misc. Case No. 355 of 2025 titled Shiv Kumari v. Anil Kumar & Ors., whereby an application filed by the opposite party no. 3 under Section 173(4) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) was allowed and the police was directed to register an FIR on the basis of allegations leveled in the app

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1391 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam