Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-15

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13855 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13855 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13855 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13855 of 2026 Raj Narayan Yadav .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of Up And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amod Pandey, Sushil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to typographical error, impugned cognizance/summoning order is missing in the prayer clause to be challenged before this Court and as such, he seeks permission to correct the same. 3. Prayer as made is hereby allowed. 4. Let necessary incorporation be carried out in the prayer clause of this application by learned counsel for the applicant during the course of day. 5. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the charge-sheet dated 10.01.2023, cognizance/summoning order dated 01.07.2023 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.1796 of 2023 (State Vs. Raj Narayan) arising out of Case Crime no.326 of 2021, under Sections 419, 406, 420 IPC, P.S. Georgetown, District- Prayagraj, pending in the court of learned Addition

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13855 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam