Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-10

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13626 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13626 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13626 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13626 of 2026 Revti Raman Yadav And Another .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhishm Pal Singh, Vipin Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Amit Kumar Tiwari, G.A., Ram Yash Chauhan Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 26.10.2025 and cognizance/summoning order dated 21.01.2026 along with entire proceedings of Case No.60 of 2026 (State Vs. Vipin Kumar Yadav and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 0431 of 2025, under Sections 61(2), 351(2), 316(2), 318(4) of BNS, P.S.- Meja, District Prayagraj, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.10, Prayagraj. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant has challenged the impugned chargesheet along with cognizance/summoning order precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breath as per the proposition of law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of D

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13626 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam