Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-03

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13623 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13623 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13623 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13623 of 2026 Satish Ramesh Tanna .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application u/s 528 BNSS has been filed for quashing the impugned summoning order dated 04.09.2021 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-4th, Allahabad and entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.1116 of 2020 (Shyam Agro Products vs. Satish Ramesh Tanna), under Section-138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Police Station-Civil Lines, District- Prayagraj, pending in the Court of learned Additional Judge/Special Judge (N.I. Act)-2nd, Allahabad, including impugned Non Bailable Warrant dated 04.12.2025 issued by the court concerned against the applicant. 3.It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that there is money dispute between the parties and opposite party no.2 has filed a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act against the applicant. Applicant moved application before tr

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13623 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam